In Sunday’s edition of the New York Times, an editorial titled “Your E-Health Records”(http://www.nytimes.
While Congress is working on passing bills that would ostensibly prevent such abuses, there is no doubt that the opportunities for misuses of private information are now unlimited. The article mentions some examples that I found especially significant, such as the fact that employers, with the now easily acquired health records, might refuse to hire a potential employee with the information that they might be more expensive to cover with health insurance. Such situations only create a more discriminatory work place, allowing employers to exploit personal health as a money-saving technique.
I think this specific area of privacy encroachment is particularly noteworthy because it involves something an individual has no control over. When the government pulls up credit card records or checks what books one has taken out of the library, it is ultimately reviewing actions that an individual has made a conscious decision to execute. However, an individual has clearly less control regarding their personal health. For example, one’s status of being diabetic and therefore as a potential employee might require a more expensive health insurance is not a role he or she has made a conscious decision to undertake. A person should not suffer any repercussions from a situation outside of their control, especially concerning certain unavoidable health issues.
No comments:
Post a Comment